As I kind of expected, it only took one episode for me to write off In Search Of. Actually, it only took half the episode.
This series is a waste of time…I’ll just say it now. In the premiere episode, “Aliens”, they feature (and quickly dismiss) two alien encounters. First a very sincere guy fails a polygraph test about being an abductee. Then, a chemist who removed an implant from his toe allows it to be analyzed by whatever lab ISO paid to do the work.
In the second story, the idiot running the test stated that it’s not alien if the elements in it are all from the Periodic Table, which is absolutely absurd. He found “mainly iron and nickel” along with other trace elements that he said are “common in dirt”. From this he concluded that since all these materials are known here, it CANNOT be alien. He is a disinformation shill.
See the cheat(s)? The fool is looking for element 107 or 108 or this thing can’t be alien. Ridiculous. A presumed doctorate scientist is telling the public that the only materials comprising extraterrestrial technology obviously HAVE to be super-heavy elements. Going by his premise, I guess every UFO must not only be powered by ununpentium (115) but made of it too! This is propaganda of the highest order, and it’s no surprise that it comes on right after the actually important and unbiased Ancient Aliens: See, after you’ve just watched the legitimate AA episode, they have to get the “maybe” out of your thoughts via some thickheaded scientist mouthpiece(s). History Channel is probably under pressure because AA has been so legitimately honest about everything. I see In Search Of as a sort of “white ops” propaganda campaign, and I highly recommend NOT watching it. Zachary Quinto fans can wait for his movies…this isn’t worth it. In fact I’d say In Search Of is actually anti-intellectual from the looks of it. A pretense of scientific detachment with a quite obvious debunking agenda.
The scientist in the first episode didn’t look at compounds. He didn’t consider structure, shape or how the object could have been made. He did nothing more than a surface evaluation of sheer elemental numbers…no looking at anything in depth. Obviously propaganda. This object contains nickel, so he basically said what the chemist had taken from his toe amounted to a dirty little piece of steel. He didn’t consider the object’s strange shape, or how odd it was that these materials had fused into such a bizarre microscopic construct—no, he just sat there like a cover-up stooge acting like the chemist/implant victim had given him the broken tip of a dirty needle.
Logical next step: Scientific Method demands a second analysis (and maybe more). We have the chemist’s own analysis (he removed the device from his body). We have this paid debunker using a lab suit to spout heavy element construction gibberish to an audience I would think should know better but apparently often doesn’t. So do we use Mr. Spock’s “logic”? Do we get a third opinion from, say, a DIFFERENT lab? NO, that’s it. Just the guy saying it is and the shill in the lab coat saying it isn’t. “Fair and balanced” never seemed so ironic.
Hard to resist suggesting that I guess you can only afford to pay off so many labs to get the responses you want.
Here’s the BS scenario they run: “Could this be alien? This guy says it is. We took it to a lab and this guy says it’s not, so I guess it’s not.” Implication: Everyone just lies to get on shows like this.
And in the previous segment of the show: “This guy swears he’s an abductee. He sure seems sincere? Is he? Let’s give him a polygraph test. Oh, he failed. I guess he (and by extension all other implant victims) must simply be lying for exposure or because of psychological issue.”
And then at the end we have Quinto throwing the standard, “Well, I started out skeptical but now I’m not so sure” bone, apropos of nothing, really. He doesn’t say that in the end he believes the witnesses, so how is he no longer sure? Like I said, this is pure propaganda, like the stuff on National Geographic Channel, so if you still feel compelled to watch it after what I’ve said here, I simply ask that you do so with these thoughts in mind. YOU decide if they’re trying to inform or dis-inform. And if you end up believing the latter, ask yourself why they would do that—after all, that’s the key to the entire cover-up phenomenon.
